Kids born through fertility treatment show normal mental development

(Reuters Health) – Despite concerns that children born through Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) may develop differently from other kids, a UK study finds they have normal mental development until at least age 11.

In fact, at ages 3 and 5 years, kids born as a result of these techniques had greater verbal cognitive ability than those born through natural conception, though this gap diminished with time. Researchers say that the older, better educated and more financially well-off parents of ART kids may play an important role in this difference at early ages.

“In the last decade, we’ve seen a huge increase in the use of ART and discussions about the outcomes and child development,” said lead author Anna Barbuscia, a sociology researcher at the University of Oxford.

The first “test tube baby” was born in the UK in 1978. And globally, about 5 million children have been conceived with ART since then, according to the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

“We’re finding that this way of birth is not linked to problems, and in fact, could show consistent better cognitive development in early childhood years,” Barbuscia told Reuters Health. “We were surprised about the results.”

She and her Oxford colleague Melinda Mills analyzed data on 15,218 children from the UK Millennium Cohort Study, which follows infants born in 2000 and 2001. All had been tested on vocabulary, verbal ability and reading at ages 3, 5, 7 and 11 years. Within this group, 186 children had been conceived through ART.

The research team found that children conceived through ART had higher verbal ability scores at ages 3 and 5 years, but the difference decreased over time and disappeared by age 11.

“We want to be very clear that our results don’t show that ART is better but that it has no impact overall on cognitive abilities,” Barbuscia said. “We’re doing additional studies now to see what the comparison is after age 11.”

One limitation of the study is the small number of ART-conceived children included. In addition, the research team writes in the journal Human Reproduction, more study is needed to understand the higher verbal skills scores among ART children at early ages.

Parental socioeconomic status, education and home environment may play a large part, for example, if those who can afford ART spend more time or money on early education efforts, the authors suggest.

“It’s perhaps surprising that the differences do not persist, but as the authors note, other factors external to the home may have more influence as the children grow up,” said Claire Carson of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit at the University of Oxford.

Carson, who wasn’t involved in the current study, has conducted similar research on the same Millennium Cohort Study population and found no differences in cognitive abilities for 3- and 5-year-olds, as well as some evidence of mental health issues among ART kids at ages 7 and 8.

“Cognitive outcomes are only one area of research into child outcomes after fertility treatment that is being conducted globally,” she told Reuters Health by email. “There are still evidence gaps with regard to long-term health and development that need to be addressed.”

To try to fill those gaps, Carson is looking at long-term health in a study of more than 200,000 children, which should include enough ART-conceived kids to assess a range of outcomes, she said.

Barbuscia and colleagues are also currently studying new data for children up to age 14, and examining influences such as socioeconomic status and parenting style.

“When it comes to fertility, medicine has to keep up with society, not the other way around,” said Dr. Jacques Balayla of the University of Montreal. Balayla, who wasn’t involved with the current work, has done similar research on ART-conceived babies in Canada. In a study published earlier this year, he found no differences from other children in the cognitive abilities of 2-year-olds born through ART. (reut.rs/2rU0NWK)

“Women are delaying motherhood, which is associated with higher risks for fertility, and we’re seeing an increasing need to use ART,” he told Reuters Health. “Understanding the consequences – not only in the short-term and for the mother, but for the long-term and in the children – is of paramount importance.”

Article provided by Reuters and Health News.

Comments

  1. Rose

    Hello, everyone!
    I am 36 years old married but childless. I got married to the man of my life five years ago. I have been TTC for the past three years, but I have not been successful. We visited various clinics where different types of tests were carried out to ascertain our fertility. All the tests carried out on me showed that there is nothing wrong with me and that I am capable of conceiving. However, tests on my husband’s sperms showed that the sperm count is low and so he is not capable of fertilizing a woman. Because of this, I embarked on research which led me to biotexcom where I learned that it is possible to conceive through the IVF technology. However, I have established that children born using the IVF technology have serious health problems later in their lives. It has been postulated that the technology bypasses what scientists call the “female cryptic choice”- where the best sperm manages to fertilize the egg. Doctors choose the sperm to fertilize the egg. I am not an expert in this area, but I know there are knowledgeable people on this forum who can explain this in a language that we can understand. If you are, what is your view?

    1. Diana

      Hi,
      I have read your post, and it prompted me to reply it. I am not an expert, and I don’t think I can answer the question you posed. However, there are a few things I would want us to clarify here. Before that. Let me introduce myself. I am 34 years old and have been TTC for the past six years. I got married in 2010, and we planned to have a baby towards the end of 2011. Unfortunately, I did not conceive that year, and it prompted us to start TTC. It has been a long journey, and we have visited fertility clinics here and abroad, but nothing has come forth. While in South Africa, I went tough some rigorous tests and examinations and my doctor confirmed that I cannot conceive because of fallopian tube issues. In fact, it is at this clinic that I learned that women with a similar problem could conceive through IVF. I started researching the process, and I think I should be going for the process early next year. Because of the cost, we have decided that we shall have the process in Ukraine. A friend of mine has introduced me to one of the managers at Biotexcom, and I hope it will help me conceive and bear a child. However, I have read in your post that this technology bypasses Female cryptic choice meaning that the sperm that fertilizes the egg is not the best and it could have its weaknesses. Kindly expound on this.